Allahabad High Court
/11724/2025 of YARVENDU TIWARI Vs U.O.I. THRU. SECY. MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS on 8 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11724 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. This writ petition has been filed with the following main prayers :- To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby directing opposite
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11724 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. This writ petition has been filed with the following main prayers :- To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby directing opposite party no.2 to pay the insurance claim amount of Rs.31,86, 718/- to the opposite party no.3 in respect of repair of petitioner's vehicle number UP32SN4014 vide bill order no.2024382222 dated 26.02.2025 according to the insurance IDV values so that the petitioner may receive his vehicle. i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the opposite party no.2 to decide the representation dated 24.09.2025 made on behalf of petitioner, contained as Annexure No.10 to this writ petition. ii. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Satyajeet Banerji who appears on behalf of National Insurance Company. Shri Satyajeet Banerji has raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the writ petition in extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. He says that petitioner has alternative and efficacious remedy before the District Consumer Redressal Commission. This petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the aforesaid Commission.
December 8, 2025 mks Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Maurya, Rahul Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Satyajit Banerji (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Yarvendu Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) U.O.I. Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Finance, New Delhi And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MANISH SAXENA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench