Allahabad High Court
/7026/2025 of RAMANAND Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS on 8 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7026 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7026 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to State respondents to decide Case No. 9737/2025 Computerized Case No. T202508300609737, U/s - 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Ramanand Vs. Shivanand and others), expeditiously.
4. It is urged that though the matter is being listed but for one reason or the other, the aforesaid case is not being decided.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
6. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Tarabganj, Gonda is directed to decide Case No.
Computerized Case No. T202508300609737, U/s - 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Ramanand Vs. Shivanand and others), expeditiously, say Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anjani Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Ramanand .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
8. Learned counsel for petitioner undertakes that petitioner shall cooperate in the proceedings and shall appear before the concerned authorities on all the date fixed irrespective of the call for boycott of local bar association.
9. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 8, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 7026 of 2025
(Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench