Allahabad High Court

/11730/2025 of ASHARAM VERMA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. DISTT. MAGISTRATE DISTT. AYODHYA AND 5 OHTERS on 8 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11730 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. This petition has been filed with the following main prayers :- (i) issue a writ, order or

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11730 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. This petition has been filed with the following main prayers :-

(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding opposite parties no.1 to 4 to take decision on the representation dated 17.11.2025 pending disposal before them which is annexed as Annexure - 1.

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding opposite parties no.1 to 4 to ensure strict enforcement and compliance of the interim status quo order dated 13.11.2025 passed by the Chief Revenue Officer, Ayodhya.

(iii) Direct opposite parties no.3 and 4 to provide immediate police protection to the petitioner and take necessary action to prevent private respondents no.5 and 6 from raising any illegal construction or encroaching upon Gata No.295. It has been submitted that the Chief Revenue Officer in Case No.5756/2025 (Asharam Verma vs. State of U.P. and Others) pending under Section 30 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has passed an interim order on 13.11.2025 directing that status quo be maintained with respect to Gata No.295 till the next date of listing. Such order is not being complied with. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ghanshyam Verma, Deepali Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Asharam Verma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Distt. Magistrate Distt. Ayodhya And 5 Ohters .....Respondent(s)

Petitioner has made a representation in this regard to the Chief Revenue Officer, Ayodhya copy of which has been filed as Annexure

- 1. This petition is disposed of with a direction to the Chief Revenue Officer, Ayodhya to look into the grievance of the petitioner and then pass appropriate orders thereon strictly in accordance with law. December 8, 2025 mks WRIC No. 11730 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANISH SAXENA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead