Allahabad High Court
/11472/2025 of MOHAMMAD AARIF ALIAS ANNA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS on 8 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11472 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for respondents no.1 to 9. 2. Instant petition has been filed praying for issuance of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11472 of 2025
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for respondents no.1 to 9.
2. Instant petition has been filed praying for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party nos.1 to 7 to direct the opposite party no.8 to restrain the opposite party nos.9 to 13 from interference in the peaceful living of the petitioner and also not to harass the petitioner; with a further prayer to direct the opposite party nos.1 to 8 to protect life and liberty of the petitioner and his family members.
3. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the police is repeatedly harassing the petitioner on one pretext or the other.
4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A., on the basis of instructions sent by Incharge Inspector, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Gonda dated 04.12.2025 that the petitioner is not being harassed in any manner.
5. The aforesaid statement is recorded. The petition stands disposed of.
6. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner has also expressed a threat being extended by the police authorities. In case threat is extended to the petitioner, it is open to for him to apply for grant of security in pursuance of the policies as issued by the State Government. In case the petitioner applies, the same should be considered expeditiously. December 8, 2025 Anand/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilendra Kumar Goswami Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Mohammad Aarif Alias Anna .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench