Allahabad High Court
/1855/2025 of PINTU SAROJ @ BRIJLAL Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 8 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1855 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Case called out. None appears for the petitioner despite a notice having been affixed on the notice board that the matter would be taken at 02.15 PM.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1855 of 2025
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Case called out. None appears for the petitioner despite a notice having been affixed on the notice board that the matter would be taken at 02.15 PM.
2. Instant petition has been filed praying for a quashing of the FIR No.244 of 2024 under Sections 61(2), 217, 231, 308(6) BNS police station Sangramgarh, District Pratapgarh.
3. At the very outset, learned AGA on the basis of instructions dated 25.10.2025 received from Police Station Sangramgarh, District Pratapgarh states that a charge sheet dated 03.07.2025 has been submitted against the petitioner and others before the supervisory authority.
4. Learned AGA further points out that the charge sheet has been filed after collecting credible evidence from perusal of which it emerges that prima facie the crime committed by the petitioner/accused is borne out.
5. Considering the aforesaid, the Court is not expected to hold a mini trial in order to verify the allegations as levelled in the FIR and the charge sheet vis-a-vis the grounds as taken by the petitioner in the instant petition keeping in view the law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Muskan vs. Ishaan Khan (Sataniya) and others; 2025 INSC 1287.
6. Even otherwise, having considered the allegations as levelled in the FIR vis-a-vis the grounds taken by the petitioner in the writ petition no Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : O.P. Tiwari, Umesh Pratap Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Pintu Saroj @ Brijlal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
case on merits is made out.
7. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to pursue appropriate remedy.
December 8, 2025 prateek CRLP No. 1855 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench