Allahabad High Court
/11665/2025 of LUXMI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. COMMISSIONER AND SECY. BOARD OF REVENUE AND 2 OTHERS on 8 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11665 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. and perused the record. This petition has been filed with the following main prayer :- "to
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11665 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. and perused the record. This petition has been filed with the following main prayer :- "to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no.2 to consider and take a appropriate decision by passing a reasoned order on the claim of the petitioner and application dated 28.08.2025 and reminder application dated 11.09.2025 contained as Annexure No.1 preferred by the petitioner in the pursuance of the order dated 21.10.2024 and Circular dated 05.05.2025 under the 'Krashak Durghatna Kalyan Yojana' accordingly the Government order dated 28.02.2020 within a stipulated time period, treating it within time, in the interest of justice." Learned Standing Counsel on the basis of instructions says that the claim of the petitioner has been rejected on 15.3.2025. A copy of the order dated 15.3.2025 shall be supplied by the learned Standing Counsel to the learned counsel for the petitioner today itself. Written instructions produced before this Court are kept on record. Writ petition is disposed of. December 8, 2025 mks Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Naresh Singh, Rajjan Lal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Luxmi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Commissioner And Secy. Board Of Revenue And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MANISH SAXENA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench