Allahabad High Court
/6984/2025 of SMT. PRINCY PANDEY AND 2 OTHERS Vs CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION FOURTH FAIZABAD / AYODHYA AND 2 OTHERS on 8 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6984 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6984 of 2025
Court No. - 17
HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Shri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the Civil Judge, Senior Division-IV, Ayodhya/Faizabad to decide an application moved under Section 151 C.P.C. in the Regular Suit No.320 of 2025 (Smt. Princy & Ors. Vs. Shobhnath & Anr.).
3. Keeping in view the nature of the relief sought and order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the respondents is hereby dispensed with.
4. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that he has wrongly impleaded the Civil Judge, Senior Division-IV, Ayodhya/Faizabad as respondent in the petition and upon his oral request, he is permitted to strike out the name of Civil Judge, Senior Division-IV, Ayodhya/Faizabad as respondent from the memo of the petition, during the course of the day.
5. The aforesaid suit has been filed by the petitioners for a decree of declaration that the Will dated 13.11.2014 is null and void.
6. The learned counsel for the petitioners has confined his prayer to the issuance of a direction for disposal of an application (paper no.46(ग)) for summoning the signatures of the testator from the State Bank of India, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hari Om Pandey, Pankaj Gupta, Rajat Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Smt. Princy Pandey And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Civil Judge Senior Division Fourth Faizabad / Ayodhya And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
Branch- Harintanganj, District- Ayodhya and to get the signatures on the Will compared with the signatures in bank account of the testator.
7. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed off by issuing a direction to the Civil Judge, Senior Division-IV, Ayodhya/Faizabad to decide the application (paper no.46(ग)) in Regular Suit No.320 of 2025 (Smt. Princy & Ors. Vs. Shobhnath & Anr.), expeditiously, in accordance with law, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties and, thereafter, to proceed with the suit proceeding and conclude the same, expeditiously. December 8, 2025 V. Sinha A227 No. 6984 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench