Allahabad High Court
/7027/2025 of RAM DHANI AND ANOTHER Vs CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, SADAR, RAEBARELI AND OTHERS on 8 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7027 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7027 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to State respondents to decide Recall Application no. R/647 dated 17.11.2023 in Case No. 647/2022-23 (Matadin Vs. Sarjudeyi & others), expeditiously.
4. It is urged that though the matter is being listed but for one reason or the other, the aforesaid case is not being decided.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
6. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Consolidation Officer (Sadar), District Raebareli is directed to decide Recall Application no. R/647 dated 17.11.2023 in Case No. 647/2022-23 (Matadin Vs. Sarjudeyi & others), expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prem Kumar, Shubhranshu Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Dhani And Another .....Petitioner(s) Consolidation Officer, Sadar, Raebareli And Others .....Respondent(s)
is no legal impediment.
8. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
9. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 8, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 7027 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench