Allahabad High Court

/7023/2025 of SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. BASIC EDUCATION SECTT. LKO. AND 9 OTHERS on 8 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7023 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Mr. Ramesh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Amarendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 and Ms. Seema Dixit, learned Standing

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7023 of 2025

Court No. - 17

HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Mr. Ramesh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Amarendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 and Ms. Seema Dixit, learned Standing Counsel for the State.

2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has sought the issuance of a direction to the UP Lok Ayukt to decide the petitioner's complaint which is pending since 17.03.2025.

3. Learned counsel for the Up-Lok Ayukt has stated that upon the petitioner's complaint, a report was sought from the Directorate of Pension whereof three members' committee was constituted for submitting the report but no report has yet been received in the office of UP Lok Ayukt and, therefore, Up-Lok Ayukt is unable to proceed with the matter.

4. On the basis of oral instructions, Ms. Sheela Singh, learned Standing Counsel has informed that the inquiry has been completed and report will be forwarded to the office of UP Lok Ayukt within a period of one week.

5. In such circumstances, the petition stands disposed off by directing the State to forward the inquiry report to the office of Up-Lok Ayukt, UP who will take appropriate action in the matter, accordingly. December 8, 2025 V. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Singh, Himanshu Deepak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Amarendra Pratap Singh (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Satyendra Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Basic Education Sectt. Lko. And 9 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead