Allahabad High Court
/6989/2025 of ASHOK KUMAR Vs THE ADDITIONAL PRIN. JUDGE VI FAMILY COURT LKO. AND ANOTHER on 8 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6989 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the petitioner is taken on record. 2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6989 of 2025
Court No. - 17
HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the petitioner is taken on record.
2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has wrongly impleaded the Additional Principal Judge-VI, Family Court, Lucknow as respondent in the petition and upon his oral request, he is permitted to strike out the name of Additional Principal Judge-VI, Family Court, Lucknow as respondent from the memo of the petition during, the course of the day.
3. Heard Shri Sudesh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the Additional Principal Judge-VI, Family Court, Lucknow to decide the Regular Suit No.3610 of 2022 (Ashok Kumar Vs. Smt. Sarita Yadav).
5. Keeping in view the nature of the relief sought and order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the respondents is hereby dispensed with.
6. The aforesaid suit was filed by the petitioner in the month of October, 2022. The defendant put in appearance before the Family Court on 03.03.2023 but did not file any objection, thereafter, when she did not file a written statement in spite of numerous opportunities having been granted to her, her opportunity to file the same was closed by means of an order dated 02.08.2024 and since then the matter is being posted for hearing ex-parte submissions.
7. In these circumstances, the petition stands disposed off by issuing a direction to the Additional Principal Judge-VI, Family Court, Lucknow to decide the Regular Suit No.3610 of 2022 (Ashok Kumar Vs. Smt. Sarita Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Ashok Kumar .....Petitioner(s) The Additional Prin. Judge Vi Family Court Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s)
Yadav), expeditiously, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties and conclude the same at the earliest by fixing dates at short intervals. December 8, 2025 V. Sinha A227 No. 6989 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench