Allahabad High Court
/1053/2025 of DEEPAK VERMA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND OTHERS on 8 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1053 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard. 2. Instant petition has been filed praying for a quashing of the FIR No. 12 of 2025, under Sections 109, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of B.N.S., 2023,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1053 of 2025
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard.
2. Instant petition has been filed praying for a quashing of the FIR No. 12 of 2025, under Sections 109, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Lambhua, District Sultanpur.
3. At the very outset, learned AGA on the basis of instructions received from Shri Kamlesh Kumar, Police Station Lambhua, Sultanpur dated 04.12.2025 states that a charge sheet dated 09.04.2025 has been submitted before the Court.
4. Learned AGA further points out that the charge sheet has been filed after collecting credible evidence from perusal of which it emerges that prima facie the crime committed by the petitioner/accused is borne out.
5. Considering the aforesaid, the Court is not expected to hold a mini trial in order to verify the allegations as levelled in the FIR and the charge sheet vis-a-vis the grounds as taken by the petitioner in the instant petition keeping in view the law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Muskan vs. Ishaan Khan (Sataniya) and others; 2025 INSC 1287.
6. Even otherwise, having considered the allegations as levelled in the FIR vis-a-vis the grounds taken by the petitioner in the writ petition no case on merits is made out. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sachin Pandey, Satyendra Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Pramod Kumar Deepak Verma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
7. Upon the same being pointed out, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not intend to press the writ petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to pursue appropriate remedy as may be available to him.
8. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. December 8, 2025 prateek CRLP No. 1053 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench