Allahabad High Court
/11702/2025 of GOLI @ GOLIRAM Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. U.P. AND 4 OTHERS on 8 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11702 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel who appears on behalf of the State-respondents nos.1, 2 and 3. 2. This
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 11702 of 2025
Court No. - 2
HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel who appears on behalf of the State-respondents nos.1, 2 and 3.
2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following main prayers:- "i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Opposite party no.3 to comply the circular issued by the D.G.P. U.P. dated 11.03.2023 and further be pleased to direct the opposite party no.2 to take the appropriate action for non-compliance of the Circular dated 11.03.2023 against the Opposite party no.6 contained as Annexure No.5 to the writ petition, in the interest of justice.
ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Opposite party no.2 to pass the appropriate order upon the application dated 10.11.2025 contained as Annexure No.6 to the writ petition within stipulated period and further be pleased to direct the opposite party no.2 to hold an inquiry against the Opposite party no.3 for helping the Opposite party nos.4 and 5 against the law in the interest of justice." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nripendra Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Goli @ Goliram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
3. It has been submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner had filed a Suit for Permanent Injunction No.482 of 2025 [Goli Vs. Gokul and Others] before the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shrawasti, which Suit is pending disposal and in which an ad-interim direction has been issued by the Trial Court on 01.09.2025 restraining the Respondents from disturbing the status- quo of the property in question. The Respondent nos.4 and 5 are the defendants of the said Suit. They are real brothers of the petitioners and because of the interference of the Station House Officer, Police Station Sonwa, District Shrawasti, he is being forced to vacate the property which is in his possession.
4. This petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file an application under Order 39 Rule 2A before the Court concerned where his Suit is pending. December 8, 2025 N.PAL WRIC No. 11702 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- NARESH PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- NARESH PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench