Allahabad High Court
/7055/2025 of GEETA YADAV Vs LEARNED TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL-LALGANJ, DIVISION PRAYAGRAJ, PRATAPGARH AND ANOTHER on 8 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7055 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Ms. Nisha Devi, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the order proposed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7055 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Ms. Nisha Devi, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondent is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Lalganj, Division - Prayagraj, District - Pratapgarh, to decide Case No. 02404 of 2019 (Computerized Case No. T 201802570202404) - Geeta Yadav Vs. Ramadhar, U/S 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Lalganj, Division - Prayagraj, District - Pratapgarh, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Lalganj, Division - Prayagraj, District - Pratapgarh, is directed to decide Case No. 02404 of 2019 (Computerized Case No. T 201802570202404) - Geeta Yadav Vs. Ramadhar, U/S 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
December 8, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nisha Devi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Geeta Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Learned Tehsildar, Tehsil-Lalganj, Division Prayagraj, Pratapgarh And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench