Allahabad High Court
/7065/2025 of Munni Devi Vs State of U.P. through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and ORS. on 8 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7065 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7065 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 3 - Naib Tehsildar, Masaudha, Tehsil - Sohawal, District - Ayodhya, to decide Mutation Case No. RST/6332/2024 (Computerized Case No. T 202404230206332), U/S 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 3 - Naib Tehsildar, Masaudha, Tehsil - Sohawal, District - Ayodhya, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 3 - Naib Tehsildar, Masaudha, Tehsil - Sohawal, District - Ayodhya, is directed to decide Mutation Case No. RST/6332/2024 (Computerized Case No. T 202404230206332), U/S 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
December 8, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar, Rahul Yadav, Rajneesh Dev, Sarita Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Munni Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench