Allahabad High Court
/10038/2025 of VAIBHAV SINGH TOMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. TECHNICAL EDU. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 8 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10038 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Pankaj Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Rahul Shukla, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Shri Anurag Shukla, learned counsel for respondent no.3- Dr. APJ
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 10038 of 2025
Court No. - 17
HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Shri Pankaj Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Rahul Shukla, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Shri Anurag Shukla, learned counsel for respondent no.3- Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam, Technical Univesity, Rajkiya Engineering College.
2. By means of the instant writ petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the respondent no.3. to rectify the petitioner's result.
3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner has pursued B.Tech course in Rajkiya Engineering College, Ambedkar Nagar but in the third semester examination, the petitioner was not declared 'passed' in two subjects i.e. Mathematics-III (RAS-301) and Digital Logic Design (REC- 30). Therefore, he appeared in back paper of the aforesaid subjects in the year, 2024-25 wherein, the petitioner was declared to have failed as in Mathematics-III (RAS-301), he was awarded 6 marks in internal examination and 29 marks in external examination. In Digital Logic Design (REC-30), he was awarded 5 marks in internal examination and 23 marks in external examination.
4. The learned counsel for the University has stated that the petitioner's request for re-valuation is under active consideration and the decision will be taken thereon within a period of two weeks. He has further submitted that in case, the petitioner submits an application for permission to again appear in written examination along with an affidavit, his request will be considered sympathetically by the University. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Gupta, Arsh Bugga, Surya Prakash Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Anagh Shukla, Atul Kumar Dwivedi, Shubham Tripathi Vaibhav Singh Tomar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Technical Edu. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed off by leaving it open to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation along with affidavit to the University and the University shall take an appropriate decision thereon, expeditiously and sympathetically. . (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) December 8, 2025 V. Sinha WRIC No. 10038 of 2025 2
Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench