Allahabad High Court
/11427/2025 of YASIR ALI KHAN Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS on 8 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11427 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the respondents-State. No notice is being issued to the private respondents taking
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11427 of 2025
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the respondents-State. No notice is being issued to the private respondents taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed.
2. Instant writ petition has been filed praying for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents No.2 & 3 i.e. Superintendent of Police, Bahraich and Station House Officer, Police Station Nanpara, Bahraich to conduct fair and proper investigation of the FIR No.0458 of 2025 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Nanpara, District Bahraich.
3. Contention is that despite the aforesaid FIR having been lodged on 24.09.2025 and substantial period having lapsed since then, the police authorities are not investigating the matter in fair manner.
4. Learned A.G.A. on the basis of instructions dated 04.12.2025 sent by Shri Shashi Pratap Singh, Police Station Nanpara, Bahraich states that investigation is going on and would be completed expeditiously. Aforesaid statement is recorded.
5. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the police authorities to conclude the investigation pertaining to the aforesaid FIR in accordance with law under relevant rules in a fair manner, which investigation would be concluded within a period of six Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shailendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Yasir Ali Khan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
6. It is made clear that this court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. December 8, 2025 prateek CRLP No. 11427 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench