Allahabad High Court

WRIA/14079/2025 of DR. RAM ADHAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF MED. HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE LKO. AND 5 OTHERS on 5 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14079 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the authority concerned to conclude disciplinary

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - A No. - 14079 of 2025

Court No. - 7

HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.

2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the authority concerned to conclude disciplinary proceedings initiated vide charge-sheet dated 26.09.2016. Further prayer for a direction to opposite parties to pay provisional pension and leave encashment to petitioner during pendency of departmental proceedings/criminal trial has also been sought.

3. On the basis of instructions, learned counsel for petitioner, submits that prayer - 2 may be directed to consider in view of the fact that departmental and criminal proceedings initiated against petitioner are still pending.

4. Considering innocuous nature of prayer and without entering into the merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.1 i.e. State of U.P. through its Principal Secretary, Department of Medical Health and Family Welfare, Civil Secretary, Lucknow - or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.

5. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 5, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Himanshu Kamboj, Amit Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Dr. Ram Adhar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Med. Health And Family Welfare Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead