Allahabad High Court
WRIC/11541/2025 of M/S ASIF ENTERPRISES THRU. MOHD. ASIF Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF MEDICAL HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE AND 2 OTHERS on 5 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11541 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State Respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed with the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 11541 of 2025
Court No. - 2
HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State Respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed with the following main prayers:- "A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.3 to make the payment of the admitted outstanding amount of Rs. 4,95,000/- alongwith interest of 12% per annum from the date of submission of the final bill. B. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.1 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 28.10.2025 (Annexure -5) within stipulated period of time."
3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that a contract was entered into between the petitioner and the respondent no.3. The petitioner has done the work and has raised a bill of Rs.4,95,000/-. Till date he has not been paid his dues. He has already made a representation in this regard to the respondent no.1.
4. Learned Standing Counsel for the State Respondents has informed this Court that representation should have been to respondent no.3/Chief Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Kumar Gupta, Ramendra Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. M/S Asif Enterprises Thru. Mohd. Asif .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Medical Health And Family Welfare And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
Medical Officer, Sitapur.
5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application to the Chief Medical Officer, Sitapur/respondent no.3 within a week from today. If such an application is made, the Chief Medical Officer, Sitapur/respondent no.3 shall consider the same and pass a reasoned and speaking order thereon within a period of three weeks thereafter. December 5, 2025 Darpan Sharma WRIC No. 11541 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- DARPAN SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench