Allahabad High Court
A227/7045/2025 of RAMJATI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS on 5 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7045 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents while notice on behalf of respondent No.6- Gram Sabha has been accepted by
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7045 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents while notice on behalf of respondent No.6- Gram Sabha has been accepted by Sri Dileep Kumar Pandey.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 2- Additional Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow to decide case Appeal No.C202210000000565 titled as "Janardan and others Vs. Gram Sabha Mandariya and others", expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no.2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 - Additional Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow is directed to decide Appeal No.C202210000000565 "Janardan and others Vs. Gram Sabha Mandariya and others expeditiously, say within a period of six months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment.
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 5, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sunendra Kumar, Santosh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey (Alok Mathur,J.) Ramjati .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench