Allahabad High Court
A482/10070/2025 of SANJNA DEVI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 5 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10070 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking following main relief(s):- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the entire
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10070 of 2025
Court No. - 13
HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard.
2. The instant application has been filed seeking following main relief(s):- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the entire criminal proceedings arising out of Charge-Sheet No.01 dated 04.03.2024 submitted in FIR/Case Crime No.24/2024, under Section 419 IPC and Sections 6 & 10 of the Uttar Pradesh Public Examination Act, 1998, Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Pratapgarh as well as impugned summoning order dated 20.12.2024 passed by the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pratapgarh, in aforesaid case."
3. On account of some formal defects crept in this application, learned counsel for the applicant at the very outset prays for withdrawal of this application with liberty to the applicant to file a fresh application with proper prayer(s), pleadings and documents in support thereof.
4. The aforesaid has not been opposed.
5. In view of the above, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for.
6. Office is directed to return certified/original copies of the documents annexed with this application to the learned counsel for the applicant as per relevant Rules in this regard. December 5, 2025 Harshita. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Parashu Ram Kanaujia Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Sanjna Devi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench