Allahabad High Court
A482/1552/2020 of SONU DHOBI @ SONU KANAUJIYA and 2 ORS. Vs STATE OF U.P and ANR. on 5 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1552 of 2020 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A as well as learned counsel for the respondent no.3. 2. The instant petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been risen
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1552 of 2020
Court No. - 23
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A as well as learned counsel for the respondent no.3.
2. The instant petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been risen out of the proceedings i.e. Criminal Case No.7345 of 2013 : State Vs. Sonu Dhobi and others, Crime No.80/2010, under Sections 498-A, 323 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Mahila Thana Hazratganj, District Lucknow pending in the court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (CBI), Lucknow.
3. Vide order dated 23.11.2021, the parties were directed to appear before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court for the purpose of mediation.
4. From perusal of mediation report dated 23.11.2021, it transpires that the mediation has got successful/completed with an agreement which is enclosed with the mediation report. Both the parties i.e. first party petitioner no.1. Sonu Dhobi @ Sonu Kanaujia and respondent no.2 Smt. Poonam Devi were present before the Mediation and Conciliation in the presence of their counsels namely Shri Suresh Chand Rathor, Advocate and Shri P.K.Sharma, Advocate.
5. The settlement agreement arrived at between both the parties dated 23.11.2021 reads as under :- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Suresh Chand Rathour Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Praveen Kumar Sharma, Tej Pratap Singh Sonu Dhobi @ Sonu Kanaujiya And 2 Ors. .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P And Anr. .....Opposite Party(s)
"A) That both the parties have decided to live together with love, affection, giving due respect to each other and taking good care of each other. B) That both the parties have agreed to behave respectfully to the family members of each other and the family members will also not interfere in the peaceful married life of both the parties. C) That the Second Party agrees to live with the First Party at the place where ever he would work and she does not want to carry on the proceedings of Complaint Case No. 7345 of 2018, U/S 498-A, 323 IPC and ¼ of Dowry Prohibition Act Police Station- Mahila Thana, Hazaratganj District- Lucknow. Besides the above if any other case is filed between both the parties shall be withdrawn by either of the parties."
6. In view of thereof, the aforesaid application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is being disposed of in terms of settlement dated 23.11.2021, which shall form part of this order and both the parties shall abide with the clauses mentioned in the settlement dated 23.11.2021. December 5, 2025 Shukla A482 No. 1552 of 2020 2 (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench