Allahabad High Court
A482/10151/2025 of RAJU VERMA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER on 5 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10151 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed by the applicant for the following
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10151 of 2025
Court No. - 13
HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
3
Decisions referred to
In this index
2
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record.
2. The present application has been filed by the applicant for the following main relief(s):- "WHEREFORE it is most respectfully prayed that in the above noted facts and circumstances, this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to quash the charge sheet dated 28.06.2018 (hereinafter referred as the “Impugned charge Shweet") filed in case crime no. 71/2018, under section 174 I.P.C. at Police Station Aliganj, District - Ambedkar Nagar, along with entire and consequential proceedings arising from there (hereinafter referred as the "Impugned Proceedings") in the interest of justice."
3. At the very outset, the learned counsel for the applicant stated that liberty may be given to the applicant to file bail application before the trial court which may be directed to be decided in view of law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case(s) of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116, and also to prefer a discharge application before the court below and the same may also be directed to be decided expeditiously.
4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant.
5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicant applies for bail before the court concerned, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Maya Ram Yadav, Akhand Pratap Verma, Onkar Nath Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Raju Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Liberty is also granted to the applicant to move discharge application before the court below, if the charges have already not been framed, which shall be decided expeditiously in accordance with law.
7. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today or till the applicant applies for bail, whichever is earlier, they would not take any coercive action against the applicant in the aforesaid case. It is made clear that in this regard, no application shall be entertained.
8. With the aforesaid observations, the present application is disposed of. December 5, 2025 Arun/- A482 No. 10151 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench