Allahabad High Court
CRLP/11395/2025 of DR. LAXMI NARYAN TRIPATHI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO. AND OTHERS on 5 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11395 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA appearing for the respondents and Sri Suyesh Pradhan, learned counsel, who has filed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11395 of 2025
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA appearing for the respondents and Sri Suyesh Pradhan, learned counsel, who has filed Vakalatnama today on behalf of the accused.
2. By means of instant petition, the petitioner has prayed for a mandamus commanding opposite parties to conduct fair and proper investigation at case Crime No.0095 of 2025 dated 150402025 under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 324(4), 309(6) & 109(1) of B.N.S. Police Station Kotwali Sadar, District Sitapur.
3. At the very outset, learned AGA states on the basis of instructions sent by one Sri Anoop Kumar Shukla, Sub Inspector, Police Station Kotwali Sadar, District Sitapur dated 04.12.2025, that a charge-sheet dated 04.12.2025 has been prepared under Sections 115(2) & 352 of the B.N.S., 2023 and submitted before the supervisory authority. Learned AGA further states that investigation has been concluded in a fair manner. The aforesaid statement is recorded.
4. Upon the same being pointed out, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not intend to press this petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to pursue appropriate remedy as may be available to him.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. . (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) December 5, 2025/Reena/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjeev Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Dr. Laxmi Naryan Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench