Allahabad High Court

A227/7008/2025 of SHIV KUMAR Vs SMT. NAZMUL NISHA AND OTHERS on 5 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7008 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent while Sri Mohan Singh is present for the Gaon Sabha- respondent No.8. 2. In

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7008 of 2025

Court No. - 5

HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent while Sri Mohan Singh is present for the Gaon Sabha- respondent No.8.

2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.

3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide Appeal No.871/250/2011-12, (Smt. Nazmul Nisha Vs. Shiv Kumar and others) under Section 331 of U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act, expeditiously.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case the aforesaid case is considered and decided in a time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya is directed to decide Appeal No.871/250/2011-12, (Smt. Nazmul Nisha Vs. Shiv Kumar and others) under Section 331 of U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act expeditiously, say within a period of six months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment.

6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.

7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 5, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Neera Yadav, Riya Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Shiv Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Smt. Nazmul Nisha And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead