Allahabad High Court
WRIA/13953/2025 of CHANDAN PATHAK Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. U.P. PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. LKO. on 5 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13953 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard petitioner in person and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Amendment Application filed today is taken on record. 3. Since the amendment sought is
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 13953 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard petitioner in person and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Amendment Application filed today is taken on record.
3. Since the amendment sought is relatable to the initial prayer made in the petition, the Application is therefore allowed.
4. Consequential amendments in the memorandum of petition shall be incorporated during course of the day.
5. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to permit petitioner to join in Prantiya Khand, Lok Nirman Vibhag, Siddharth Nagar. Further prayer has been made for a decision on petitioner's representation.
6. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of four weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order.
7. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. December 5, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : In Person Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Chandan Pathak .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. U.P. Public Works Deptt. Lko. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench