Allahabad High Court
WRIC/11144/2025 of MOHD. SALMAN Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS on 5 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11144 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri Varun Pandey, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos.2 and 3 and learned Standing Counsel
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 11144 of 2025
Court No. - 2
HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri Varun Pandey, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos.2 and 3 and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos.1, 4 and 5.
2. This petition has been filed with the following main prayer:- "Issue writ, order of direction in the nature of the mandamus whereby directing the opposite parties specifically to the opposite party no.3, to make renewal of the passport of the petitioner baring Passport No. P 3025441 is going to expired on 10.08.2026."
3. It has been submitted by learned Counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is residing in Kuwait and he has asked his brother to file this petition on his behalf. A copy of the letter issued by the petitioner to his brother has been filed along with Vakalatnama.
4. Sri Varun Pandey, learned Counsel for the respondents, has raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the petition. He says that no Power of Attorney has been executed by the petitioner in favour of his brother.
5. It has also been pointed out that the petitioner has submitted his reply Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., A.S.G.I. Mohd. Salman .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
to the show cause notice issued to him, but such reply has to be decided by the Embassy in Kuwait and not by the Regional Passport Officer, Lucknow. So this petition has been filed at a place without jurisdiction.
6. This petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to approach the Embassy concerned at Kuwait. December 5, 2025 Rahul WRIC No. 11144 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAHUL TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench