Allahabad High Court

WRIB/1108/2025 of JANARDAN PRASAD Vs DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, PRATAPGARH AND OTHERS on 5 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - B No. - 1108 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Dhirendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondent no. 1. 2. In the light of proposed order notice to private respondents is

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - B No. - 1108 of 2025

Court No. - 5

HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Sri Dhirendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondent no. 1.

2. In the light of proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.

3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that against order dated 25.11.2020, passed by the Settlement Officer (Consolidation), the petitioner has preferred revision before the Deputy Director of Consolidation, which is numbered as Suit No. 2020530257000035 - Janardan Vs. Neelkanth, which is pending consideration.

4. It has been next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that an application for interim relief has also been filed by the petitioner, on which no orders have been passed and prayer has been made that there is urgency in the matter inasmuch as the private respondents are alienating the property.

5. In the light of above, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move appropriate application giving necessary reason for urgency before the Deputy Director of Consolidation. In case any such application is filed within next two weeks, the Deputy Director of Consolidation shall proceed to consider and decide the same within two weeks thereafter by means of reasoned and speaking order. In case Deputy Director of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dhirendra Kumar Mishra, Manoj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Janardan Prasad .....Petitioner(s) Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Pratapgarh And Others .....Respondent(s)

Consolidation finds that there is urgency in the matter, he shall proceed to consider and decide the interim relief application of the petitioner with expedition, in accordance with law after giving full opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned.

6. Subject to above directions present writ petition stands disposed of. December 5, 2025 A. Verma WRIB No. 1108 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead