Allahabad High Court
A482/10124/2025 of MAHENDRA SINGH @ MAHENDRA BAHADUR SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER on 5 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10124 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State of U.P. and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed for the following main relief(s):-
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10124 of 2025
Court No. - 13
HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State of U.P. and perused the record.
2. The present application has been filed for the following main relief(s):- "i. To set aside the entire criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No. 14600 of 2025 "State Versus Mahendra Singh" pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1, Raebareli arising out of Case Crime No. 79 of 2024, under sections-419, 420, 467, 468 & 471 I.P.C. Police Station Maharajganj, District-Raebareli alongwith summoning order dated 26.08.2025 and chargesheet dated 26.06.2025 as contained in Annexure No.1 & 2 to this petition.
ii. To stay the further proceedings of Criminal Case No. 14600 of 2025 "State Versus Mahendra Singh" pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-l, Raebareli."
3. At the very outset, the learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that without acceding the main prayer(s) sought in the application, the instant application may be disposed of with liberty to applicant to prefer discharge application, which may be directed to be decided by the court concerned most expeditiously.
4. To the aforesaid, there is no objection.
5. Accordingly, the instant application is disposed of with liberty to applicant to prefer discharge application before the Court concerned which shall be considered and decided most expeditiously by the Court concerned.
6. With the aforesaid, the application is disposed of finally. December 5, 2025 Harshita. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Gargi Prakash Misra, Sunita Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Mahendra Singh @ Mahendra Bahadur Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench