Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14066/2025 of SHABBIR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. FOREST LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 5 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14066 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief:- "i. Issue a writ, order or
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 14066 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned Counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite parties to fix and pay the pension to the petitioner after including the services rendered by him on daily wages basis and pay the arrears accordingly with all consequential benefits."
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.3 i.e. Conservator of Forest, Devipatan Circle, U.P. Gonda, - or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same, in light of judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in the case Prem Singh v. State of U.P. and others [(2019) 10 SCC 516] and judgment rendered by this Court in case of Jai Ram Sharma v. State of U.P. and others, Writ-A No. 731 of 2024, within a period of eight weeks, from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 5, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Madhav Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Shabbir .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Forest Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench