Allahabad High Court
WRIC/11447/2025 of ANEETA KUMARI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. COMMISSIONER AND SECY. BOARD OF REVENUE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 5 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11447 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State Respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed with the following
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 11447 of 2025
Court No. - 2
HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State Respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed with the following main prayers:- "(a) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party No. 2 to Consider and take a appropriate decision by passing a reasoned order on the claim of the petitioner and application dated 20.08.2025 and reminder application dated 11.09.2025 Contained as Annexure No.1 preferred by the petitioner in the pursuance of the order dated 21.10.2024 and Circular Dated 05.05.2025 under the 'Krashak Durghatna Kalyan Yojana" accordingly the government order dated 28.02.2020 within a stipulated time period, treating it within time, in the interest of justice."
3. It has been informed that the claim of the petitioner was filed with delay, and therefore, it was not considered.
4. We are of the considered opinion even in case where the claim was filed with a delay, an order should be passed indicating the reasons for non-consideration of such application/claim. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Naresh Singh, Rajjan Lal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Aneeta Kumari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Commissioner And Secy. Board Of Revenue Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent to decide the claim of the petitioner December 5, 2025 Darpan Sharma WRIC No. 11447 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- DARPAN SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench