Allahabad High Court
WRIC/11467/2025 of NASREN BANO Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE OF U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 5 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11467 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State Respondents and Sri Ashutosh Srivastava, Advocate who has filed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 11467 of 2025
Court No. - 2
HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State Respondents and Sri Ashutosh Srivastava, Advocate who has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no. 2 & 3, which is taken on record.
2. This writ petition has been filed with the following main prayers:- "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 03 to consider an take a appropriate decision by passing a reasoned order on the accidental benefit claim application dated 02-07-2019 of the petitioner contained as Annexure no, 1 under the (LIC of India) accordingly with in a stipulated time period, treating it with in time, in the interest of justice.
(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party No.03 to consider an take a decision on application dated 02-07-2019 regarding the accidental benefit claim of petitioner on merit as contained as annexure no.1 to this writ petition in the interest of justice."
3. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Life Insurance Corporation, on the basis of instructions, says that the claim is pending only because the petitioner has not given relevant documents to the LIC. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sanjeev Singh Nasren Bano .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Of U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 3 to indicate by a written letter the documents that are required to be submitted by the petitioner and send such letter within one week through registered post to the petitioner. Once such letter is received the petitioner shall comply with the demand made by the respondent no.3 regarding documents and submit the same in the office of the respondent no. 3 within 15 days of receipt of such letter.
5. After submission of such documents, the Branch Manager, LIC, Station Road, Lucknow shall pass an appropriate order within a period of six weeks thereafter. December 5, 2025 Darpan Sharma WRIC No. 11467 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- DARPAN SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench