Allahabad High Court
WRIC/11461/2025 of VINAY KUMAR Vs U.O.I. THRU. ITS SECY. MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS NEW DELHI AND 7 OTHERS on 5 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11461 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Sumit Tahilramani, learned counsel appearing for the BPCL, Sri Arvind Kumar Shukla, learned counsel
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 11461 of 2025
Court No. - 2
HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Sumit Tahilramani, learned counsel appearing for the BPCL, Sri Arvind Kumar Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the respondents no. 5 to 7 and Sri Sushil Kumar Sharma, Advocate who has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the private respondent no. 8, which is taken on record.
2. This writ petition has been filed with the following main prayer:- "i.. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS thereby commanding the opp. Parties specially the opp. Party No. 2 & 3 to allow the objection of the petitioner and cancel application for allotment of petrol Pump of the opp. Party No.8 on the disputed land Purandarpur Sonoli road Between Local NH 24 Stone 35 to 40, so that the petitioner could get justice."
3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has already filed an objection to the allotment made in favour of the private respondent, which has not been decided till date.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 4 /Territory Manager (Retail) to decide the objection, which is pending against such allotment, after giving opportunity of hearing to the opposite party no. 5, 6 , 7 & 8, within a period of four Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dileep Kumar Pathak, Prashant Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., S M Singh Royekwar Vinay Kumar .....Petitioner(s) U.O.I. Thru. Its Secy. Ministry Of Petroleum And Natural Gas New Delhi And 7 Others .....Respondent(s)
weeks from the date a copy of this order is produced before him. December 5, 2025 Darpan Sharma WRIC No. 11461 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- DARPAN SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench