Allahabad High Court
A483/1028/2025 of ROOPCHAND ALIAS ROOP CHANDRA SINGH Vs THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER on 5 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 1028 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been preferred by the applicant
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 1028 of 2025
Court No. - 13
HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
3
Decisions referred to
In this index
2
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record.
2. The instant application has been preferred by the applicant for the following main relief:- "the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct to the learned Judicial Magistrate Third Lucknow to decide the Criminal Case No. 66471 of 2022, (State Versus Rohit Singh), arising out of Case Crime No. 253/2021, under section 498-A, 323, 504 & 506 IPC& Section 3/4 D. P. Act, registered at Police Station Sarojni Nagar, District Lucknow, pending in the court of Learned Judicial Magistrate Third Lucknow, expeditiously in a stipulated period as this Hon'ble Court may deemed fit."
3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case indicated in the application including the period of pendency of the case in issue, the Magistrate shall endeavour to dispose of every application made under sub- section (1) within a period of sixty days from the date of its first hearing, the present application is disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to make all endeavour for concluding the proceedings of the case in issue, expeditiously as according to various pronouncements of the Hon'ble Apex Court including the judgment(s) passed in the case of Maneka Gandhi Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sunil Dixit, Sunil Kumar Awasthi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Roopchand Alias Roop Chandra Singh .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
Versus Union of India and Another (1978) 1 SCC 248, Hussainara Khatoon Versus Home Secretary, State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 81, Kadra Pahadiya and Others Versus State of Bihar (1981) 3 SCC 671, the right to speedy trial/disposal of case is implicit under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
4. With the aforesaid, the instant application is disposed of. December 5, 2025 Anurag A483 No. 1028 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench