Allahabad High Court
NA528/2017/2025 of RANJEET AND 4 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER on 5 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 2017 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s) and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The present application has been preferred seeking following main
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 2017 of 2025
Court No. - 13
HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
3
Decisions referred to
In this index
2
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s) and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record.
2. The present application has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):- "Wherefore it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash the Charge-sheet dated 02.03.2025 filed by the investigating Officer, against the petitioners in Case Crime No./FIR No. 0149/2024, U/S-191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 117(2), 352, 351(3) BNS. Police Station- Mahigawan, Lucknow Northern (Commissionerate Lucknow) against the petitioners and cognizance/summoning order dated contained as Annexure No. 1 to this petition in the interest of justice."
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant(s) submitted that at this stage, he is confining his prayer to seek the benefit of the judgment(s) passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116 for which liberty may be given to the applicant(s) and liberty may also be given to the applicant(s) to approach this Court again at appropriate stage for seeking appropriate relief.
4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant(s).
5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for.
6. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shaquiel Ahmad, Ashwani Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ranjeet And 4 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
Musheer Alam (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today, they would not take any coercive action against the applicant(s) in the aforesaid case. It is made clear that in this regard, no application shall be entertained. December 5, 2025 Anurag NA528 No. 2017 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench