Allahabad High Court
WRIC/11342/2025 of JITENDRA SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. COMMISSIONER AND SECY. BOARD OF REVENUE AND 2 OTHERS on 5 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11342 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel, who appears on behalf of State-Respondents. This petition has been filed with the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11342 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel, who appears on behalf of State-Respondents. This petition has been filed with the following main prayers : "A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party No. 2 to Consider and take a appropriate decision by passing a reasoned order on the claim of the petitioner and application dated 28.08.2025 and 06.09.2025 Contained as Annexure No.1 preferred by the petitioner in the pursuance of the order dated 21.10.2024 and Circular Dated 05.05.2025 under the 'Krashak Durghatna Kalyan Yojana" accordingly, the government order dated 28.02.2020 within a stipulated time period, treating it within time, in the interest of justice." It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that under the Mukhyamantri Krashak Durghatna Kalyan Yojana, the petitioner filed a claim petition regarding the death of his brother, Mataru Singh. Such claim petition is pending before the District Magistrate, Hardoi. Hence, this petition has been filed. This petition is disposed of without entering into the merits of the controversy, with a direction to the District Magistrate, Hardoi, to decide the petitioner's claim petition, if not already decided, by a speaking and reasoned order within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him. December 5, 2025 Mahesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Naresh Singh, Rajjan Lal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Jitendra Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Commissioner And Secy. Board Of Revenue And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAHESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench