A482/9990/2025 of MOHD. SAEED Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND ANOTHER on 5 December 2025

1. Sri Digvijay Mishra, Advocate, has put in appearance for the complainant and has filed his Vakalatnama, which is taken on record.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Instant application has been preferred by the applicant(s) for the following main relief(s):- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned chargesheet dated 10/04/2024 and summoning order dated 05/08/2024 along with other consequential proceedings pending before Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Room No. 27, Lucknow, in Case No.14893/2024, "State. Vs. Mohd Saeed.", arising out of FIR No. 007/2024, under Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC read with 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Chinhat, District Lucknow East (Commissionerate Lucknow), as contained in Annexure-1 and 2 to this Writ Petition.

To stay the further proceeding pending before Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Room No. 27, Lucknow, in Case No.14893/2024., "State. Vs. Mohd Saeed.", arising out of FIR No. 007/2024, under Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC read with 3/4 Dowry P.S. Chinhat, District Lucknow Prohibition Act, East (Commissionerate Lucknow), during the pendency of this Petition before this Hon'ble Court in the interest of justice."

4. It is stated that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court and have entered into a compromise and a copy of compromise Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anand Kumar Tiwari, Iqbal Ahmed Ahmedullah Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohd. Saeed .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s)

deed, duly signed by the parties, is annexed as Annexure No. 4 to the present application. As such, keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the parties and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in this regard, the proceedings impugned are liable to be quashed.

5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court.

6. Considering the aforesaid, this application is disposed of finally in following terms:-

(i) The parties to the proceedings in issue shall appear and file the compromise before the concerned court within four week's from today.

(ii) If the parties appear before the concerned court in terms of above, the concerned Court shall proceed to verify the compromise between the parties to the proceedings and prepare a report to the same effect and the original compromise deed be made part of record.

(iii) The concerned court shall conclude the process of verification of compromise within two week's from the date of production of copy of this order.

(iv) The concerned court shall permit the parties to the proceedings to obtain the certified copy of the report as well as compromise deed.

(v) It shall be open to the applicant(s) to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.

(vi) Office is directed to provide original compromise, if any, to the counsel for the applicant(s), after retaining its photocopy on record. It is for the purposes for its verification by the concerned court.

(vii) For a period of eight weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant(s) in the aforesaid case. December 5, 2025 Anurag A482 No. 9990 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench