Allahabad High Court

NA528/1957/2025 of TRIBHUVAN KORI @ LALA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER on 5 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1957 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State of U.P. and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed for the following main

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1957 of 2025

Court No. - 13

HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State of U.P. and perused the record.

2. The present application has been filed for the following main relief(s):- "The petitioner named above most respectfully begs to submit that for the facts, reasons and circumstances stated in the accompanying affidavit, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to Petition Under Section 528 B.N.S.S And 482 CRPC for quashing of the entire proceeding on basis of cognizance order dated 21/08/2025 Passed by Learned Court CJM Sultanpur and pending at Learned Court ASJ/FTC-2 Sultanpur in Criminal Case. NO. 1135/2025 on the basis of Charge-sheet filed under sections 310(4)/310(5)/61(2) BNS-2023 and 3/25 Arms Act, Police Station

- Kotwali Nagar, District - Sultanpur, dated 20/08/2025, arising out of F.I.R./Case Crime No. 509/2025, under sections 310(4)/310(5)/61(2) BNS-2023 and 3/25 Arms Act, dated 23/06/2025 Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District - Sultanpur, Styled As (State Vs Manoj & others) Police Station - Kotwali Nagar, District - Sultanpur, A true Certify Copies of cognizance order dated 21/08/2025 and Charge sheet dated 20/08/2025 are being annexed as herewith as Annexure No.1 and 2. To this petition, so far it relates to the present Petitioner. It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly also be pleased to stay the further proceeding of the aforesaid case, pending before the Learned Court ASJ/FTC-2 Sultanpur in regard to present petitioner."

3. At the very outset, the learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that without acceding the main prayer(s) sought in the application, the instant application may be dismissed with liberty to applicant to prefer discharge application, which may be directed to be decided by the court concerned most expeditiously.

4. To the aforesaid, there is no objection.

5. Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed with liberty as prayed for. December 5, 2025 Harshita. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Krishna Gopal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Tribhuvan Kori @ Lala .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead