Allahabad High Court

WRIA/11975/2025 of SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY./ADDL.CHIEF SECY. IRRIGATION WATER RESOURCE DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS on 5 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11975 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. Order on Application Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. Petition had earlier been filed with following main relief:- i)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11975 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. Order on Application Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. Petition had earlier been filed with following main relief:-

i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari thereby quashing the impugned order dated 12.8.2025 passed by opposite party No.6, contained in Annexure No.1 to the writ petition.

ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari thereby quashing the impugned order dated 24.7.2025 passed by opposite party No.2/3, contained in Annexure No. I to the writ petition.

iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari thereby quashing the impugned order dated 27.6.2025 passed by opposite party No.1, as contained in Annexure No.1 to the writ petition.

iv) a Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding/directing the opposite parties to allow the petitioner to continue to work and discharge his duties on the post of Junior Engineer (Civil), Sharda Sahayak Khand-49, Sultanpur and pay him salary and allowances regularly every month." Application has been filed seeking withdrawal of writ petition. For reasons indicated in the affidavit filed in support of the application, the application is allowed and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file afresh. December 5, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Raj Ojha, Shohit Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Sanjeev Kumar Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy./Addl.Chief Secy. Irrigation Water Resource Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead