Allahabad High Court

WRIC/11340/2025 of SANDHYA DEVI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. COMMISSIONER AND SECY. BOARD OF REVENUE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 5 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11340 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel, who appears on behalf of State-Respondents. This petition has been filed with the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11340 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel, who appears on behalf of State-Respondents. This petition has been filed with the following main prayers : "(i) A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no.2 to consider and take a appropriate decision by passing a reasoned order on the claim of the petitioner and application dated 03.07.2025 Contained as Annexure No.1 preferred by the petitioner in the pursuance of the order dated 21.10.2024 and Circular Dated 05.05.2025 under the 'Krashak Durghatna Kalyan Yojana" accordingly the government order dated 28.02.2020 within a stipulated time period, treating it within time, in the interest of justice." It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that under the Mukhyamantri Krashak Durghatna Kalyan Yojana, the petitioner filed a claim petition regarding the death of her husband, Sachin Kumar alias Sonu, S/o Bechelal, on 03.07.2025. Such claim petition is pending before the District Magistrate, Hardoi. Hence, this petition has been filed. This petition is disposed of without entering into the merits of the controversy, with a direction to the District Magistrate, Hardoi, to decide the petitioner's claim petition, if not already decided, by a speaking and reasoned order within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him. December 5, 2025 Mahesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Naresh Singh, Rajjan Lal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Sandhya Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Commissioner And Secy. Board Of Revenue Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAHESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead