Allahabad High Court
A227/7033/2025 of SANDEEP KUMAR KASAUDHAN Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS on 5 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7033 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents are hereby
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7033 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to respondent No.2 -Tehsildar, Tehsil Milkipur, District Ayodhya to decide Case No.5237 of 2025, computerized case No.T-202304230405237, under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code titled as Sachin Agrahari Vs. Durga Prasad, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case the aforesaid case is considered and decided in a time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No.2 -Tehsildar, Tehsil Milkipur, District Ayodhya is diected to decide Case No.5237 of 2025, computerized case No.T-202304230405237, under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code titled as Sachin Agrahari Vs. Durga Prasad, expeditiously, say within a period of three months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment.
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 5, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Roshani Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Sandeep Kumar Kasaudhan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench