Allahabad High Court
A482/6452/2018 of JAGDISH BABU YADAV Vs STATE OF U.P. and ANOTHER on 5 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6452 of 2018 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. None is present on behalf of the applicant and opposite party No.2 despite repeated calls. However, learned AGA for the State is present. 2. By means of present application,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6452 of 2018
Court No. - 33
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. None is present on behalf of the applicant and opposite party No.2 despite repeated calls. However, learned AGA for the State is present.
2. By means of present application, applicant has prayed for following reliefs: "(i) quash the entire criminal proceedings of Case No.2721 of 2018, Afzal Hussain vs. Jagdish Babu under Sections 138 Negotiable Instrument Act, Police Station Kotwali Unnao, District Unnao including impugned summoning order dated 28.02.2018 passed by Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.5, Unnao.
(ii) Stay the further proceedings of Case No. 2721 of 2018, Afzal Hussain vs. Jagdish Babu under Sections 138 Negotiable Instrument Act, Police Station Kotwali Unnao, District Unnao, pending in the Court of Civil Judge (J.D.) F.T.C. Unnao."
3. Perusal of the records transpires that the matter is of the year 2018.
4. Apparently, the prayer made by the applicant is of a summary nature, which is required to be disposed of within the stipulated time as specified.
5. Despite availing several opportunities none has turned up to press this application. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Indrajeet Shukla, Shashikant Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate, Anjum Ara, Devesh Deo Bhatt, Mohammad Irfan Siddiqui, Mohd. Shahanshah Newaz Kh Jagdish Babu Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
6. By efflux of time, either the application has become infructuous or the applicant has lost interest in the application, therefore, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. December 5, 2025 Reena/- A482 No. 6452 of 2018 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench