Allahabad High Court
A482/1141/2020 of RAM NARAYAN Vs STATE OF U.P. and ANR. on 5 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1141 of 2020 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. None appears on behalf of the applicant to press the present application even in the revised list whereas learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent is present. 2. By means of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1141 of 2020
Court No. - 33
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. None appears on behalf of the applicant to press the present application even in the revised list whereas learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent is present.
2. By means of present application, applicant has prayed for quashing the impugned chargesheet dated 27.08.2010 as well as entire proceeding of the Case No.1408 of 2011 (State of U.P. vs. Ram Narayan and others) arising out of Case Crime No.292 of 2010, under Sections 409 & 411 IPC Police Station Kotwali Akbarpur, District Ambedkar Nagar.
3. Perusal of the record reveals that a chargsheet has been filed before the competent trial court on 27.08.2010.
4. Challenging the chargesheet present application has been filed in the year 2020.
5. Earlier, vide order dated 24.02.2020, time was granted to seek instructions relating to updated status i.e. cognizance has been taken by court concerned on the chargesheet or not.
6. Despite of the order of this Court, no instructions has been filed till date.
7. It appears that since chargesheet was filed on 27.08.2010 and impugned application has been filed challenging the chargesheet in the year 2020 but none appeared to press the application, therefore, it is apparent that by efflux of time, either the applicant has no interest or the matter has become infructuous. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Balak Ram Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ram Narayan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And Anr. .....Opposite Party(s)
8. In view thereof, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
9. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) December 5, 2025 Reena/- A482 No. 1141 of 2020 2
Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench