Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14047/2025 of MUBEERNUR RAHMAN Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BHOOMI VIKAS EVAM JAL SANSADHAN LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 5 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14047 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief(s):- "(i) To issue a writ, order or
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 14047 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief(s):- "(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondents to forthwith grant the benefit of 3rd ACP to the petitioner with effect from the date 01.06.2013 it has been sanctioned to the petitioner, along with all consequential benefits including arrears of pay and interest.
(ii) To issue a writ, order, or direction directing the respondents to grant the petitioner the benefit of 3rd ACP as it has been and granted to the similarly situated employees who were sanctioned and granted the 3rd ACP pursuant to the same Screening Committee recommendation."
3. It has been submitted that despite the fact that opposite parties have already sanctioned aforesaid benefit by means of order/letter dated 23.11.2015 but the same has not been provided to petitioner although similarly persons have already been granted the said benefit.
4. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Mubeernur Rahman .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Bhoomi Vikas Evam Jal Sansadhan Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
before opposite party no.1 i.e. State of U.P. through its Principal Secretary, Bhoomi Vikas Evam Jal Sansadhan, Anubhag - 2, Government of U.P., Civil Secretariat, Lucknow, - or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
5. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 5, 2025 lakshman WRIA No. 14047 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench