Allahabad High Court

/14008/2025 of RAMAKANT RAWAT AND 4 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HORTICULTURE LKO AND 2 OTHERS on 4 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14008 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State counsel for opposite parties. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "i. Issue a writ, order or

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - A No. - 14008 of 2025

Court No. - 7

HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State counsel for opposite parties.

2. The present petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to restraining them from making any deductions for Sundays and other Gazetted Holidays.

ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no.2 to pay minimum of pay scale to the petitioners along with dearness allowance regularly without deducting the payment for Sundays and other Gazetted and State Government declared holidays from the salary account and not from the wages account as paid to other similarly situated persons.

iii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay the arrears of minimum of pay Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Ateeq Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ramakant Rawat And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Horticulture Lko And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

scale to the petitioner."

3. Learned counsel for petitioners has drawn attention to order dated 26.03.2003 whereby such benefits as claimed by petitioners have already been directed to be ensured.

4. Since consideration of petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioners to file fresh individual representation before opposite party No.2 i.e. Director, Horticulture & Food Processing, Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided in the light of orders dated 26.03.2003 and 07.06.2006 within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. In case petitioners are found entitled for the aforesaid benefits, actual payment thereof shall be ensured within a period of six weeks thereafter. The concerned authority shall also consider the aspect of interest on delayed payment.

5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 4, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 14008 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead