/2002/2025 of SHAKTI SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 4 December 2025

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 2002 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Mr. Ramendra Singh, learned Advocate has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party nos.2 and 3, which is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s), learned Counsel for the opposite party nos.2 and 3, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. The instant application has been filed for the following main relief:- "For the facts, reasons and circumstances stated in the accompanying Affidavit, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to quash the entire criminal proceeding initiated against the petitioners in pursuance of the impugned charge sheet dated 14.10.2024 arising out of Case Crime No.336/2024, Under Sections: 85, 115(2), 123, 352, 75 BNS & section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station- Mohanlalganj, District Lucknow as well as cognizance/summoning order dated 19.10.2024 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Lucknow in Criminal Case No. 101406/2024 (State Versus Shakti Singh & Another) in terms of the compromise deed dated 28.10.2025, as contained in Annexure No.1 & 2 respectively to this petition." Learned counsel for the applicant(s) submitted that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court and have entered into a compromise. As such, keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the parties and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in this regard, the proceedings impugned are liable to be quashed. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Trial Court as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. Considering the aforesaid, the instant application is disposed of finally in Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manjeet Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shakti Singh And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s)

following terms:-

(i) The parties to the proceedings i.e. Case Crime No.336/2024 (supra), shall appear before the concerned Court within six weeks' from today and file the compromise.

(ii) If the parties appear before the concerned Court in terms of above, the concerned Court shall proceed to verify the compromise between the parties to the proceedings and prepare a report to the same effect and the original compromise deed be made part of record.

(iii) The concerned Court shall conclude the process of verification of compromise within two weeks' from the date of production of copy of this order.

(iv) The concerned Court shall permit the parties to the proceedings to obtain the certified copy of the report as well as compromise deed.

(v) It shall be open to the applicant(s) to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.

(vi) Office is directed to provide original compromise, if any, to the Counsel for the applicant(s), after retaining its photocopy on record. It is for the purposes for its verification by the concerned court.

(vii) For a period of eight weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant(s) in the aforesaid case. December 4, 2025 Jyoti/- NA528 No. 2002 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench