Allahabad High Court
/11421/2025 of SMT. MAMTA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME SECTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 4 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11421 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. appearing for the respondents No.1 to 3. 2. No notice be issued to the respondent No.4
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11421 of 2025
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. appearing for the respondents No.1 to 3.
2. No notice be issued to the respondent No.4 taking in view of nature of order proposed to be passed.
3. The instant petition has been filed praying for quashing of the F.I.R. dated 22.11.2025 bearing F.I.R. / Case Crime No.0280 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 109 of B.N.S., P.S. Babu Banarsi Das, District Lucknow.
4. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that on the bare perusal of the allegations as levelled in the F.I.R., it emerges that the petitioner along with several others have severely beaten up the complainant and the victim with the result that they have suffered severe injuries and hence, the F.I.R.
5. The contention is that no such incident ever took place and it is the false F.I.R. which has been lodged against the petitioner.
6. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. states that the investigation is still going and she fairly states that only simple injuries have been suffered by the victim.
7. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Shyam, Nisha Kumari, Renu Devi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Smt. Mamta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Sectt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
direction to the respondent-authorities not to take any coercive action against the petitioner in pursuance to the impugned F.I.R. till some credible evidence emerges against her during the course of investigation.
8. It is needless to mention that the petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation, failing which, the protection of this order may be withdrawn on the application being moved by the prosecution or the complainant. December 4, 2025 S. Shivhare CRLP No. 11421 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench