Allahabad High Court
/11796/2025 of NANHKE Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. COLLECTOR, UNNAO AND OTHERS on 4 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11796 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Standing counsel for the State - respondents while notice on behalf of respondent No.3 has been accepted by Sri Dileep Kumar Pandey. 1. In view
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 11796 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Standing counsel for the State - respondents while notice on behalf of respondent No.3 has been accepted by Sri Dileep Kumar Pandey.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondent is dispense with.
2. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer for a direction to respondent No.2 - Sub Divisional Officer, Hasanganj, District Unnao to decide the stay application filed in suit for division of land, expeditiously.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no.2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No.2 - Sub Divisional Officer, Hasanganj, District Unnao is directed to decide application for interim relief preferred by the petitioner in suit for division of land within a period of six weeks after service of notice on the respondents in accordance with law and in case the application for interim relief cannot be decided, it shall be open for the petitioner to press ad-interim relief which the appellate authority shall consider and decide, in accordance with law.
5. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
6. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dheerendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey Nanhke .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Collector, Unnao And Others .....Respondent(s)
With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
7. December 4, 2025 RKM. WRIC No. 11796 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench