Allahabad High Court

NA528/1998/2025 of AVINASH KAMAL Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO on 4 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1998 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. The instant application has been filed by the applicant to permit

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1998 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. The instant application has been filed by the applicant to permit him to submit two sureties and personal bond in all the cases in which he was roped. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in four cases. He next submitted that in all the cases registered against the applicant, he has been granted bail by the court concerned. He says that the applicant is a very poor person and not in a position to furnish huge sureties in each and every case in compliance of bail orders. It is further submitted that the details of cases registered against applicant at District Ambedkar Nagar are (i) Case crime No.84/2024 u/s 109(1) B.N.S & 3/25 Arms Act of P.S-Bhiti, (ii) Case Crime No.73/2025 u/s 309(4), 317(2), 61(2) B.N.S of P.S-Bhiti, (iii) Case crime No.172/2025 u/s 3(1) U.P. Gangster Act of P.S-Bhiti, and the details of case registered against applicant at District Barabanki are (i) Crime No.138/2025 u/s 309(4), 317(2) B.N.S of P.S Ram-Nagar. Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8914-8915 of 2018; Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P. Learned A.G.A. submits that he does not want to file any counter affidavit. Considering the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (Supra) and also the observations made by this Court in the case of Shivam Gupta @ Shubham @ Lavi vs. State of U.P. through Secretary Home Civil Sectt. Lko (Application U/S 482 No.466 of 2024) as well as in Dr. Abhishek Yadav vs. State of U.P. (Application U/S 482 No.18948 of 2023), the present application is allowed with a direction that in case the applicant provides two sureties, out of which one should be of family member, and bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- in Case crime No.84/2024 u/s 109(1) B.N.S & 3/25 Arms Act of P.S-Bhiti, District- Ambedkar Nagar then the same shall be held good in rest of the cases registered against the applicant at Districts Barabanki and Ambedkar Nagar and the applicant shall be released on bail on that sureties. December 4, 2025 Jyoti/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rehan Ahmad Siddiqui Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Avinash Kamal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead