Allahabad High Court
/13995/2025 of RAMSAGAR VISHWAKARMA AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. / ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF AYUSH LKO AND ANOTHER on 4 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13995 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State counsel for opposite parties. 2. The present petition has been filed seeking the following main reliefs:- "I. Issue a writ, order
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 13995 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
2
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State counsel for opposite parties.
2. The present petition has been filed seeking the following main reliefs:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to provide the entire retiral dues of the Petitioners with counting of the adhoc services petitioners for the purpose of determination of post retiral benefits within time as directed by this Hon'ble Court.
II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the opposite parties to release the monthly pension of the Petitioners regularly every month and count the entire adhoc services period discharge by the Petitioners as ad hoc employee for the purpose of determination of pension and other retiral benefits within time as directed by this Hon'ble Court."
3. Learned counsel for petitioners has placed reliance on judgment rendered in the cases of Prem Singh versus State of U.P. & Ors.; (2019)10 SCC 516, Jai Ram Sharma versus State of U.P. & Ors. passed in Writ A No.731 of 2024 as well as the recent judgment rendered in the case of Jaggo v. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Avinash Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ramsagar Vishwakarma And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. / Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Ayush Lko And Another .....Respondent(s)
Union of India & Ors. [2024SCC OnLine SC 3826], petitioners are entitled to relief.
4. Since consideration of petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioners to file fresh individual representation before opposite party No. 1 i.e. Principal Secretary/ Additional Chief Secretary Department of Ayush, Civil Secretariat, Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such representations are filed, the same shall be decided in the light of aforesaid cases if the same are applicable, within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 4, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 13995 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench