Allahabad High Court
/11368/2025 of VINOD PAL @ VINOD KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO. AND OTHERS on 4 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11368 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the respondents-State. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11368 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the respondents-State.
With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of. By means of the instant writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the History Sheet No.A-13 opened by the respondent No.4 as well as approval order passed by respondents No.2 & 3. Further prayer is for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents not to create any hindrance in the peaceful life of the petitioner. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in this regard, petitioner may be permitted to move a representation before Superintendent of Police, Hardoi i.e. respondent No.3 and prays that he may be directed to decide the representation in accordance with law under relevant rules within a fixed time frame to which learned A.G.A. has no objection. Considering the aforesaid, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to move a representation for his grievance before the respondent No.3 within a period of 2 weeks along with a certified copy of this order. In case a representation is moved, the competent authority i.e. respondent No.3 shall proceed to decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law under Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Vinod Pal @ Vinod Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
relevant rules within a period of four weeks from the date the representation is made before it. December 4, 2025 prateek CRLP No. 11368 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench